Readyboost Windows 7 64 Bit
I understand it's supposed to be possible to use an SSD as a ReadyBoost device instead of a USB stick (note that I'm not suggesting using ReadyBoost to cache a SSD; I'm suggesting using an SSD to hold the ReadyBoost cache). This seemed to work initially.I installed an formatted the SSD. 'ReadyBoost' was an option in the device properties, and I extended the ReadyBoost cache to the SSD. It looked like it was going to work. However, after rebooting it failed with the following log message: 'The device (UnknownUnknown) will not be used for a ReadyBoost cache because the ReadyBoost driver is attached to its volume stack.' Any help would be appreciated. I've read about people using SSD as a ReadyBoost cache device, so I know it can be done.
I'm just a little lostas to what is misconfigured. Thanks, Scott.
ReadyBoost really only gives you slightly better performance if you have a machine with 1GB RAM or less. In all other scenarios ReadyBoost is useless. So using an SSD for ReadyBoost is just waste of disk space.Blogging about Windows for IT pros atI completely disagree. We have successfully ported the Readyboost feature on Windows Server 2008 R2 from the win2008workstation forums and I have seen significant tangible gains in boot time performance and application load time at startup. Considering WindowsServer 2008 R2 takes only 16 seconds to boot up on my machine is pretty impressive if you ask me for a server operating system to do so.http://i79.photobucket.com/albums/j152/halladayrules/16secbootserver.jpg. I have used a Samsung 256 GB SSD as a ReadyBoost device and have seen zero performance boost. In my experience, with systems that already have an adequate amount of system RAM (in my case, 4GB) ReadyBoost is a wasteof time.
Readyboost Windows 7 64 Bit Windows 7
ReadyBoost was put there to enhance the performance of Vista if it was installed on inadequate hardware.Anyone in their right mind would not use a 256GB SSD as a readyboost device they would use it as their primary OS!For the record I am using an inexpensive 32GB SSD that I bought online for $50 to supplement my performance on Windows Server and I have seen significant tangible gains. For smaller storage devices it is feasible, but with a storage size THAT Big (250GB)why not just use it as your primary OS? I was hoping to ask you a question or two on what if anything I might be doing wrong when it comes to getting ReadyBoost to work on a.vhd that I have in windows server 2008 r2 sp1. I was able to set this.vhd up to auto mount and host ReadyBoost in my win7 (x86) (preexisting)installation (prior to dual Boot to win2k8r2sp1), but I'm having issues accomplishing this in Win2k8r2sp1.I noticed you mentioned 'win2008workstation forums' of witch I am a new member, for the past two days now. I'm loving it!I am using the 'update-able' R2 Workstation Converter v3.
I have used a Samsung 256 GB SSD as a ReadyBoost device and have seen zero performance boost. In my experience, with systems that already have an adequate amount of system RAM (in my case, 4GB) ReadyBoost is a waste of time.ReadyBoost was put there to enhance the performance of Vista if it was installed on inadequate hardware.Anyone in their right mind would not use a 256GB SSD as a readyboost device they would use it as their primary OS!For the record I am using an inexpensive 32GB SSD that I bought online for $50 to supplement my performance on Windows Server and I have seen significant tangible gains. For smaller storage devices it is feasible, but with a storage size THAT Big (250GB)why not just use it as your primary OS?Ahhh. See, what is nice is that if you use any singe drive over 32GB, ReadyBoost will only use a maximum of 32GB allowing the remaining free space to be used as any other external storage. The stated maximum of 256GB of ReadyBooststorage is when used over 8 devices (8x32GB=256Gb) So no, all of the 256GB is not wasted. Again, this is on a single drive.
Give it a try.In either case, this was an experiment as I had just acquired the SSD and wanted to do some experimentation with it. One of the experiments was to see if there was any performance increase using ReadyBoost. Again, with my system, Windows 7 (nowWindows 8 CP) x64, 500GB 7200rpm main drive, 4GB of RAM, ReadyBoost is a waste of time-in my experience.If using an SSD as your primary OS drive, then ReadyBoost is really useless. 'DarienHawk67' wrote in message.Agreed. I have used a Samsung 256 GB SSD as a ReadyBoost device and have seen zero performance boost.
In my experience, with systems that already have an adequate amount of system RAM (in my case, 4GB) ReadyBoost is a waste of time.ReadyBoost was put there to enhance the performance of Vista if it was installed on inadequate hardware.Anyone in their right mind would not use a 256GB SSD as a readyboost device they would use it as their primary OS!For the record I am using an inexpensive 32GB SSD that I bought online for $50 to supplement my performance on Windows Server and I have seen significant tangible gains. For smaller storage devices it is feasible, but with a storage size THAT Big (250GB)why not just use it as your primary OS?Ahhh. See, what is nice is that if you use any singe drive over 32GB, ReadyBoost will only use a maximum of 32GB allowing the remaining free space to be used as any other external storage. The stated maximum of 256GB of ReadyBooststorage is when used over 8 devices (8x32GB=256Gb) So no, all of the 256GB is not wasted.
Again, this is on a single drive. Give it a try.In either case, this was an experiment as I had just acquired the SSD and wanted to do some experimentation with it. One of the experiments was to see if there was any performance increase using ReadyBoost.
Again, with my system, Windows 7 (nowWindows 8 CP) x64, 500GB 7200rpm main drive, 4GB of RAM, ReadyBoost is a waste of time-in my experience.If using an SSD as your primary OS drive, then ReadyBoost is really useless. I would love to get more info about using an SSD for ReadyBoost.
I just upgraded my Gateway P-6860FX laptop with an OCZ Agility 3 60 Gig SSD for the Boot drive, and the 320 Gig Western Digital drive for storage, and a place to install games. I am using theSSD only for the OS, some utility applications, media applications, and a few other things such as MS Office 2010. I am running Windows 7 Ultimate.At this time, I have 25.5 Gigs free on the SSD, but I haven't yet gotten all of my software installed.
If ReadyBoost is an option, I am thinking about shrinking the volume and creating a 10 Gig partition on the SSD for ReadyBoost. It's possible that I don'thave a very strong grasp on what it is that ReadyBoost does, but wouldn't it allow for faster load times of games and any other software installed on a 2.5' 320 Gig 5400 rpm drive by placing them in the ReadyBoost cache?Gateway P-6860FXIntel Core 2 Duo T5550 @ 1.83GHz4 Gig RAMGeForce 8800M GTSWindows 7 Ultimate 64 bitOCZ Agility 3 60 GigWD 320 Gig. The misinformation in this thread is astounding.Readyboost caches regularly used files in a temp file, similar to how the hybrid hard drives work, as well as used as a read/write buffer, particularly for small files that are written significantly faster on an SSD rather than a mechanical drive.It has zero to do with the amount of RAM in the machine. Doesn't factor into it at all.As for the original post, I had similar problems and changed which SATA port the drive was attached to.It didn't actually correct the problem as the problem still existed if connected to the original port, but it worked on the other port just fine. Yes, He is correct.
Windows 7 64 Bit Usb Installer
ReadyBoost does cache the files that you use of programs so you can have faster load times. And if you are using a 5400 RPM HDD, and your system came with a 16GB SSD, that is 6GB/s drive, you will see considerable difference onyour system. I am not into ReadyBoost, but if it is like ExpressCache and Intel Rapid Storage Technology, then it should even boost your Boot time. Yes, it would be useless to use on an USB 2.0 Flash Drive that is 15 MBs Read/5 MBs Write.
Purchase Windows 7 64 Bit
Even a USBHDD on USB 2.0 Is faster than the common usb 2.0 FLash drive. Don't let the term USB3.0 on a Flash drive make you think it is fast and will work faster, as I have seen them list the same Read/Write speeds as 2.0 USB, so Always read the SPECS, on theRead/Write Speeds. And of course, and USB SSD will typically be faster.Based on the BUS speed, The USB interface, The USB Drive type, will all be a determined factor of how fast the Transfer of data on ReadyBoost. However, a 16GB SSD, with the computer that is Recognized by Readyboost, should yeild the fastest results,that being it has a HIGH Data Transfer rate faster than your HDD you have installed.I have an 128GB SSD and 1TB 5400 RPM HDD in the same computer, booth have been setup at one point to boot WINDOWS and the SSD boots windows to desktop in around 5 seconds, so it seems.
Hi John,A flash drive may appear to meet the requirements, but Windows still may not detect the device as ReadyBoost-compatible if its rated speed measures sequential performance instead of random performance, and if performance is not consistentlyfast across the entire flash drive.Look for a note from the manufacturer that the flash drive is W indows ReadyBoost Compatible. Corel paint shop pro x3 serial number and activation code. Not all manufacturers list this on their packaging.You may want to check with a different flash driveAnswer to your questionsa. The speed requirements for Windows ReadyBoost are at least 2.5 MB per second throughput for 4 kilobyte (KB) random reads and 1.75 MB per second throughput for 512 KB random writes.(Article holds good for Windows 7)b. ReadyBoost acts as a HDD (Hard Disk Drive ) Read cache and is not a direct system memory replacement. It will not improve processing speed, but will help applications launch quicker and push background applicationsthat are hardly used into reserved ReadyBoost memory.For more information, refer the links belowThanks and Regards:Ajay KMicrosoft Answers Support Engineer-Visit our and let us know what you think.